Report 01 · Model records
Fable 5.1
Recorded actions, finished work, and request costs.
Fable 5.1 made more calls than Fable 5 on the Run 1 One-pager and email, but fewer on the Run 1 deck. The added One-pager work included correcting its own expected aged-deal count from nine to eight after the calculation failed that check. Further calls measured paragraph heights, rebuilt layouts, and opened cropped previews.
Its One-pager added category bars and an owner-coverage table. The recorded output volume was 68,554 tokens, compared with Fable 5’s 26,110. Their output prices were equal; Fable 5.1 had the cheaper reuse rate. Those categories explain why its One-pager cost more even with cheaper reuse. The records do not identify how many tokens belonged to any particular layout decision.
Assignment record
- Recorded cost
- $5.33
- Completion time
- 17.2 min
- Model requests
- 42
- Tool calls
- 41
The top panel compares open and weighted values with stacked bars. Owner coverage and inactive deals have separate tables. This gives more visual comparisons than Fable 5’s One-pager, but packs small text into nearly every section.
The six checked headline figures agree. The page distinguishes category and amount contributions. During creation, the model corrected its own expected count of aged deals from nine to eight.
Read and calculated
Fable 5.1 read the rules and sales files, then calculated the forecast.
Recorded calls 3, 4, 6Corrected a failed check
It checked the sales data after the PDF program failed, then corrected its expected deal count.
Recorded calls 7, 8, 9, 10Measured paragraph heights
It measured text heights and rewrote the section about problems in the sales records.
Recorded calls 14, 18, 21, 22Rearranged the labels
It measured label widths, rewrote the layout, and changed a chart explanation.
Recorded calls 24, 25, 27, 29Opened page sections
It opened cropped images, shortened labels, and checked the final PDF’s page count and fonts.
Recorded calls 30, 31, 32, 33, 39, 40, 41
First preview opened at call 23. Subsequent requests accounted for 36% of calculated token charges. This boundary includes all later work, not only revision.
Actions describe this run. The records do not reveal why the model chose every step or establish permanent model traits.
View this original output ↗Request charges by activity
Run 1 One-pager requests, grouped by the work requested from tools. Each charge includes the entire model exchange. Combined actions remain together; no charge is divided among tools.
| Requested work | Requests | Token charge |
|---|---|---|
| Read or calculate sales data | 6 | $0.24 |
| Create or edit files | 15 | $3.21 |
| Check document code or files | 14 | $1.06 |
| Create and check in one request | 5 | $0.60 |
| Setup, delivery or mixed work | 1 | $0.10 |
| Response without tools | 1 | $0.10 |
| Total | 42 | $5.31 |
Active session time is separate. Group amounts are rounded for display; the total uses unrounded charges. Activity groups were reviewed for the five Run 1 One-pagers.
Request details
Loading request records…